Abstract
The article found that the meaning of the term “discourse” correlates with a specific research position, which depends on the framework of the relevant scientific field. It is noted that distinguish the areas of language discourse of the theory of speech act, sociolinguistics, ethnography, pragmalinguistics, analysis of conversation and analysis of variables. The history of the methodology as a scientific discipline is described. The peculiarity of the technique as a discipline is noted, it is not an independent science, but relies on the data of linguistics They made the classification of methodological discourse and identified the following types: on the basis of a chronological factor on the basis of approaches to learning from the point of view of the object of learning (language, language), on the basis of approaches from the point of view of teaching methods (direct, conscious, active). Describe the periodization of methodological discourse in the English-speaking environment. In addition, we noted that depending on the purpose of learning, the methodological discourse can be divided into three periods: learning the language of teaching language activity, forming competence. Since structuralism dominates linguistics in the first period (late 19th century – early 20th century), this approach views language as a static, “complex multi-level system containing many interconnected and interdependent discrete elements”. It is in the third period of development of methodological discourse that correlates with the information model of interaction of topics of discourse, which requires from the teacher deep knowledge of linguistics, pedagogy, psychology and methodology of language learning.
Competence approach to learning contrasts with the paradigm of knowledge, which considers the activity of the student as the accumulation of knowledge, and the activity of the teacher as a translation of ready-made knowledge.
Thus, competence is a set of interrelated qualities of the individual (knowledge, skills, skills, methods of activity) associated with a certain set of objects and processes and necessary for their related qualitative productive activities. If competence is the possession of a person of the relevant competence, which includes his/her personal attitude to him/her and the subject of activity.
References
Алексеева Л. М., Мишланова С. Л. Медицинский дискурс: теоретические основы и принципы анализа. Пермь : Изд-во Перм. ун-та, 2002. 200 c.
Вятютнев М. Н. Понятие языковой компетенции в лингвистике и методике преподавания иностранных языков. ИЯШ. 2014. № 6. С. 55–64.
Гальскова, Н. Д. Современная методика обучения иностранным языкам : пособие для учителя. Москва, 2003. 192 с.
Герасименко О. Ю. Трактование «дискурса» и его характеристика в лингвистике. Интеллект, личность, цивилизация. 2021. № 1(22). С. 30–39.
Колесникова И. Л., Долгина, О. А. Англо-русский терминологический справочник по методике преподавания иностранных языков. Cambridge University Press, Русско-Балтийекий информационный центр: БЛИЦ. Санкт-Петербург, 2001. 223 с.
Колкова М. К. Традиции и инновации в методике обучения иностранным языкам / под ред. М. К. Колковой. Санкт-Петербург : КАРО, 2016. 288 с.
Лингвистический энциклопедический словарь / гл. ред. В. Н. Ярцева. 2-е изд., доп. Москва : Большая рос. энцикл., 2002. 709 с.
Онучак Л. Дискурс як об’єкт сучасної лінгвістики. Проблеми гуманітарних наук : збірник наукових праць Дрогобицького державного педагогічного університету імені Івана Франка. Серія «Філологія», 2021. 45. С. 324–332.
Проблемы учебной лексикографии и обучение лексике : сборник статей / под ред. П. Н. Денисова, В. В. Морковкина. Москва, 2015. 456 с.
Хуторской А. Ключевые компетенции как компонент личностноориентированной парадигмы образования. Народное образование. 2003. № 2. С. 58–64.
Цимбал Ю. О. Поняття «методичний термін» в англомовному педагогічному дискурсі. Філологічні студії. 2018. С. 88.
Циткина Ф. А. Терминология и перевод (К основам сопоставительного терминоведения). Львов, 1988. 155 с.
Liebert Wolf-Andreas. Communicative strategies of popularization of science (including science exhibitions, museums, magazines). Science Communication. 2019. P. 399–416.
Nichols M. D., Petzold, A. M. A crisis of authority in scientific discourse: Cultural Studies of Science Education. 2019. P. 1–8.
Koivumäki K., Koivumäki, T., Karvonen, E. Challenges in the collaboration between researchers and in-house communication professionals in the digital media landscape: Journal of Science Communication. 2021. № 20(03). P. 1–21.
Dobson M. Dialogs for Everyday Use. Washington, D.C., 2018. 85 p.